Google, RR Donnelly and the Fat Finger

Google may have surprised us with premature & disapointing results – cause for concern? Not so much.

Last Thursday, Google’s printing, or more correctly, filing company, RR Donnelly, via a subsidiary Edgar Online filed Google’s quarterly reports around 4 hours early. The market went mad – Google shares [GOOG] were suspended after falling dramatically – Bloomberg and CNBC were full of debate about litigation by investors who may have suffered losses due to the premature release. It went on. And on. The lesser part of the frantic discussion was Google’s almost 20% drop in profit, and the market wobbled because the results were missing comment from Larry Page; comment that would have been re-assuring for the key institutional investors. This comment was obviously missing because of the premature release – but the market hates surprises. Regardless of later explanation.

Only a month ago I wrote about a nunber of companies – the ones I believe that have the best market cap growth potential for 2013 – Google is one of these. Google’s current wave of innovation is its best ever – from Glasses to Chromebook they’re in The Zone. But, it’s the ads that pay the bills. And the bills are getting bigger. Employee levels have balooned following the Motorola acquisition; R&D and innovation cost money. Google are still winning the online advertising batttle, but the revenue Google get per click – the money that customers are willing to pay for a potential customer to click on their ad – is falling. This contributed to a small ‘miss’ in operating profit. I would say that’s just indicative of market conditions globally. New markets are opening up for Google – but they could take another year or so to mature – the key existing markets for Goog’e’s AdWords program are full of careful consumers and slimmed down businesses tryng to ride out a recession. Perhaps the most challenging element to emerge for Google is regarding the change in the way we consume the web. There is less space – less real-estate the (new to) web-marketing people used to call it – available for advertisments now. With tablet and mobile usage growing and accounting for as much as 20% of web traffic, there simply aren’t as many opportunities as their used to be show ads to consumers. Google still do better than Facebook in earning revenue from mobile users – the Google AdWords ‘Click to Call’ was clever development – appealing to advertisers and yet inobtrusive to consumers using mobile. But it’s that area of growth thatthey need to address. Maybe we’ll see more focus and innovation around paid listings – maybe pre-roll ads on premium content (or resultss). Would consumers balk at Flash SMS style messages before or after a search ‘Hey, we noticed you’re outside Starbucks’ Scan this QR code for a free muffin with your coffee. Google’s re-aligment as a content company means they should have the opportunity to deliver relevant ads at the right time, even on mobile devices. This is a no more than a correction. It was an expensive quarter. They’re doing good.

External links & references
CNBC analysis | Around the blogs via Guardian Tech

 

Total
0
Shares
Related Posts

Apple-V-Samsung: stiffling creativity?

So the Apple Samsung jury didn't really hang around. With a jury forman who is both an engineer and patent holder himself, it begins to make sense. This wasn't a case of a jury rushing, but it seems, a case of a well-informed jury reaching a logical outcome after due deliberation. The decision came within 48 hours of a decision in South Korea, where Samsung is headquarterd, that imposed a small net fine on Apple, and it was very much an even result - with both companies being banned froms selling some of their products, including iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPad 1 and iPad 2, and Samsung’s Galaxy S, S2, Galaxy Tab and Tab 10.1.

Apple Vs Samsung, round 1 of many

No, I'm not implying it's a high-tech paternity spat. But as things kicked off last week in Santa Clara, California under the watchful and somewhat acerbic eye of the Honorable Judge Lucy H. Koh, the world's leading and most innovative hardware makers have come face to face to argue patent law bang in the middle of Silicon Valley. You'd think there isn't a better arena for this argument, however finding a jury member who doesn't own an Apple or Samsung device,work for one the tech companies with an interest in teh case or wven own Apple or Samsung shares was always going to be tricky - indeed at one point a potential juror and Google employee, quizzed by Judge Koh said he owned a number of devices including;

Read More

Chef, Manager, Accountant, Waiter

Donec quam felis, ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa quis enim. Donec pede justo, fringilla vel, aliquet nec, vulputate eget, arcu. In enim justo, rhoncus ut, imperdiet a, venenatis vitae, justo. Nullam dictum felis eu pede mollis pretium. Integer tincidunt. Aliquam lorem ante, dapibus in, viverra quis, feugiat a, tellus. Phasellus viverra nulla ut metus varius laoreet. Quisque rutrum. Aenean imperdiet. Etiam ultricies nisi vel augue. Curabitur ullamcorper ultricies nisi. Nam eget dui.
Read More

Exploring the Path to Professional Success

Donec quam felis, ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa quis enim. Donec pede justo, fringilla vel, aliquet nec, vulputate eget, arcu. In enim justo, rhoncus ut, imperdiet a, venenatis vitae, justo. Nullam dictum felis eu pede mollis pretium. Integer tincidunt. Aliquam lorem ante, dapibus in, viverra quis, feugiat a, tellus. Phasellus viverra nulla ut metus varius laoreet. Quisque rutrum. Aenean imperdiet. Etiam ultricies nisi vel augue. Curabitur ullamcorper ultricies nisi. Nam eget dui.
newsletter-subscription

Subscribe for the free weekly newsletter with the latest reviews and any current offers.